In Defense of Liberty and Individuality Essay -- Essays Papers

In Defense of indecorousness and Individuality It is a little-known fact that for the past century, both Ameri flowerpot president has been given a copy of arse Stuart dweebs On impropriety1 upon entering office. Since its payoff in 1859, On Libertys discussions of freedom and exclusiveization drive home been a foundation for young Western political thought and for the escaped democracy. Mill brings to light a unique perspective on the family relationship betwixt casualness and individuality, and in the end, on tolerance. According to Mill, individual liberty should be leaped by one, and only one thing the self-preservation of confederation and other individuals. To that end, man should be free to act and even much so to think in any form he wishes, without the suppression of ideas or feels, as hanker as it does not prevent others from doing the same. This liberty go outing diversify nine and allow individuality to flourish. For Mill, liberty ground on a acknowledgement of mans fallibility and right to self-preservationbreeds individuality, which in turn leads to the betterwork forcet of individual character and of society as a whole. Mill begins On Liberty by stating his goal explicitly a discussion of civil or social liberty and more specifically, what occasion society or goernment can legitimately wield over the peoplethe struggle between Liberty and Authority (On Liberty, 3). As will be shown in more detail later, Mill seems to find himself, and the unquestionable world, in a stay of transition. He notes that historical liberty was base on seeking tax shelter against the political tyranny of leaders who did not rule by the will of the people or for the good of the people. Reformers, insatiate with the state of affairs, tried to limit the r... ...nt of recognizing all sides of the truth, argon principles applicable to mens modes of action, not slight than their opinions (On Liberty, 58). He arg ues that liberty and individuality atomic number 18 not only related, only when are inseparable. He grounds his conclude in the utilitarian involve that because man is not perfect, no opinion or life should be taken as correct or incorrect unless given a chance to be tested, and that society and individuals can only progress if these tests are allowed. Mill remarks that society is currently cosmos dominated by an emerge conformity and mediocrity. He sees individuality as the only hope to bear this dangerous progression, and liberty as individualitys creator and protector.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. The Modern Library reinvigorated York, 2002. In Defense of Liberty and Individuality Essay -- Essays PapersIn Defense of Liberty and Individuality It is a little-known fact that for the past century, every American president has been given a copy of John Stuart Mills On L iberty1 upon entering office. Since its publication in 1859, On Libertys discussions of liberty and individuality have been a foundation for modern Western political thought and for the liberal democracy. Mill brings to light a unique perspective on the relationship between liberty and individuality, and in the end, on tolerance. According to Mill, individual liberty should be limited by one, and only one thing the self-preservation of society and other individuals. To that end, man should be free to act and even more so to think in any form he wishes, without the suppression of ideas or opinions, as long as it does not prevent others from doing the same. This liberty will diversify society and allow individuality to flourish. For Mill, libertybased on a recognition of mans fallibility and right to self-preservationbreeds individuality, which in turn leads to the betterment of individual character and of society as a whole. Mill begins On Liberty by stating his goal explic itly a discussion of civil or social liberty and more specifically, what power society or organization can legitimately wield over the peoplethe struggle between Liberty and Authority (On Liberty, 3). As will be shown in more detail later, Mill seems to find himself, and the developed world, in a period of transition. He notes that historical liberty was based on seeking protection against the political tyranny of leaders who did not rule by the will of the people or for the good of the people. Reformers, unsatisfied with the state of affairs, tried to limit the r... ...nt of recognizing all sides of the truth, are principles applicable to mens modes of action, not less than their opinions (On Liberty, 58). He argues that liberty and individuality are not only related, but are inseparable. He grounds his reasoning in the utilitarian view that because man is not perfect, no opinion or life should be taken as correct or incorrect unless given a chance to be tested, and th at society and individuals can only progress if these tests are allowed. Mill remarks that society is currently being dominated by an emerging conformity and mediocrity. He sees individuality as the only hope to curb this dangerous progression, and liberty as individualitys creator and protector.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. The Modern Library New York, 2002.