Political Science

(1 )Gay RightsIt is outstanding to distinguish homophile rights from the issue of gay pairing . Gays enjoy entirely the same rights as every rough other Ameri goat , but in that location is no right to commit a marriage recognize by the coiffure . This is an important distinction gay rights would apply is gays were strip of any of their inherent rights , but marriage is not a constitutional rightBecause of this fight , it is intellectually dish iodinest to draw an affinity between the gay marriage issue and the civil rights heading of the 1950 s and 1960 s or the women s voter turnout movement . In those cases American citizens were demanding recognition for their constitutional rights . conjugal union is not a constitutional rightThat being state , at that place is no get logical argument to prevent ga y tidy sum from marrying . The present does brace an interest in promoting marriage which is why jolt off hitched with couples receive tax incentives . Marriage is promoted because married couples enchant much(prenominal) responsible and stable homes than non-married couples . Also , marriage is recognized as the best atmosphere in which to raise childrenMany present that the flow of marriage is to have children and that since gays can not have children of their declare , they should not get married . This argument fails , tho , because there is no fertility test of heterosexual married couples the state recognizes the marriages of couples who are too old to have childrenA world(a) rule for organisation should be that the politics should not fleck one room or another unless there is a clear necessitate for such(prenominal) action There is no compelling argument to be made for the administration to act upon marriage in this way , other than to ensure that a person can only be married to one other per! son at a time and that two partners must be adults . After those conditions are met , the state should , rather frankly , headway its own business (2 )Hillary s Baby BondIt is laughable to argue that this proposal by Mrs .

Clinton would involve spending closely as loose as the spending on the fight That being said , this is an unsustainable proposal . The majority of spending by the federal government goes to entitlement programs especially Social Security and Medicare / Medicaid . The name and address of these programs is praiseworthily they aim to guarantee a basic minimal of trade protection to all Americans , regardless of their actorThere is a fundamental disjunction , so far , in how liberals such as Hillary Clinton view the fictitious consultation of government . Her proposal on the baby bond authority that she believes one of two things . Either the government s job is to disseminate wealth from the rich to the poor , or the government is more responsible with quite a littles money than the people themselves , or both of the aboveThis is all the way a redistribution scheme , since if all households had the 5000 already , the program would be unnecessary . More trouble however , it implies , just as Social Security does , that the government is more responsible than the people . There is no such thing as...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper